Some of the issues involved in ‘Creative Practices in Transnational Urban Contexts’ can be distilled and delineated by looking at one of the 20th century’s most notorious pieces of music: Le sacre du printemps, or The Rite of Spring, by Igor Stravinsky. When premiered The Rite was controversial to say the least, as shown by the following rhyming review:
Who wrote this fiendish Rite of Spring
What right had he to write the thing,
Against our helpless ears to fling
Its crash, clash, cling, clang, bing, bang, bing?
And then to call it Rite of Spring,
The season when on joyous wing
The birds melodious carols sing
And harmony’s in everything!
He who could write the Rite of Spring,
If I be right, by right should swing!
The Rite is now accepted as part of the canon of classical masterpieces, even making its way into Disney’s Fantasia:
At the time of The Rite’s premiere Stravinsky was a Russian émigré living in Paris. Consequently, Le sacre interestingly illustrates the tension of identity involved in transnational music. The Rite is saturated with the Russian folk-tunes Stravinsky absorbed on summer trips to his uncle’s estate in rural Ustyluch, and from his music tutor, the composer Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. When writing Le sacre Stravinsky steeped himself in Russian material. The piece is a ballet, and Stravinsky took most of the story for The Rite from old Russian pagan rituals. Stravinsky’s paganism was in part a reaction to his upbringing in the Russian Orthodox Church, to which he returned in 1926. However, The Rite was written in Switzerland and premiered in Paris; Stravinsky later became an American citizen, and in 1913 was already a cosmopolitan par excellence. As Alex Ross writes in The Rest is Noise, ‘In later years, Stravinsky […] went to some lengths to conceal his early folkish enthusiasms’ (TRIN 87). Stravinsky didn’t want to be seen as a Russian artist, and only revisited his homeland in 1962, on his 80th birthday. Is The Rite of Spring a Russian or a European work, or both? Was Stravinsky a Russian, a European or an American, or all three? What does this say about national identity in general? My opinion is that nations and national identity are human constructs, and that consequently blurring and fluidity in national identity is natural.
Another issue illustrated by Le sacre is the urban tension between the organic and the synthetic. The Rite is a pagan hymn to spring, full of roars and squelches and bellows, but ‘the urban noises in Stravinsky’s score – sounds like pistons pumping, whistles screeching, crowds stamping – [also] suggest a sophisticated city’ (TRIN 93). Most of us are city-dwellers to some extent, and all of us live in a world profoundly different from that in which the human race originally evolved. The synthetic is a fact of life now; how we negotiate it as individuals is up to us.
The Rite’s disturbing climax, in a production choreographed by Maurice Bejart:
The last issues to be dealt with in this article are political, aesthetical and ethical, and tie in with the socialist flavour of some of the Creative Practices course material. The Rite of Spring would initially only have been heard by the relatively well-off in society, and Stravinsky was himself from an upper-class background. His Russian folk material, however, came from the peasants. What are we to think of inequality like this? It seems to me that it is a political wrong which needs to be righted. This political tension is closely linked to an aesthetical tension: which creative practice shall we value more, Stravinsky’s mind-searing ballet, or the folk-music it was partly derived from? High art or folk art? I believe this question is most satisfactorily answered by subsuming aesthetics into ethics. In her article on this wordpress site, Laura Penny writes: ‘music can help so many different people around the world if only we focus on what is important and forget the rest.’ I say we take up this attitude – let’s base our value judgements only on what is really important and forget the rest. But what is ‘really important’? Helping others and ourselves get by in life, i.e. reducing suffering and increasing happiness. Instead of judging music on aesthetic grounds, we should judge it ethically according to how much it helps. So what of Le sacre and its folksy sources? Because The Rite of Spring is really rather brutal and pitiless I don’t think it ‘helps’ much. If a folk creative practice is more useful to people, then it’s more valuable than Stravinsky’s masterpiece. In other words, the Creative Practices course is right in opposing ‘ivory-tower’ conceptions of art (an opposition helpfully pointed out by Phil Hale in his article ‘Art and Youtube’.)
In conclusion, Le sacre du printemps illustrates the tension between national identities in transnational music, and the tension between the natural and the synthetic in urban culture. It exemplifies the political tension between different sections of society, and the tension between aesthetical and ethical ways of valuing art. ’Focus on what is important and forget the rest’ – words to carry close-pressed to one’s heart.
Bibliography
Ross, Alex, The Rest is Noise (New York: Fourth Estate, 2008)
Dan Absolon.